matrix (matlab) version 8.1 (r2013a) Search Results


r2013a 8 1 implementation  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc r2013a 8 1 implementation
R2013a 8 1 Implementation, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/med_rxiv__2024__10__02__24314755-96-8-5?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
r2013a 8 1 implementation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab r2013a  (The Matworks Company LLC)
90
The Matworks Company LLC matlab r2013a
Matlab R2013a, supplied by The Matworks Company LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/pm25721686-113-5-9?v=The+Matworks+Company+LLC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2013a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab r2013b  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc matlab r2013b
Matlab R2013b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/pm32932640-164-5-7?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2013b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
originpro  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp originpro
Originpro, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/pm27347837-131-6-9?v=OriginLab+corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
originpro - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
optimization platform tomlab version 8.1  (Tomlab Optimization)
90
Tomlab Optimization optimization platform tomlab version 8.1
Optimization Platform Tomlab Version 8.1, supplied by Tomlab Optimization, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/pmc04823303-127-10-12?v=Tomlab+Optimization
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
optimization platform tomlab version 8.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
originpro 8.1  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp originpro 8.1
Originpro 8.1, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/pmc03896915-175-14-16?v=OriginLab+corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
originpro 8.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
pmod (version 3.0)  (PMOD Technologies)
90
PMOD Technologies pmod (version 3.0)
Pmod (Version 3.0), supplied by PMOD Technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/pm28572290-75-42-45?v=PMOD+Technologies
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pmod (version 3.0) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
n a pcdna3 akar4 depry  (Addgene inc)
93
Addgene inc n a pcdna3 akar4 depry
Figure 6. Non-canonical recruitment of PKA catalytic subunit to RIa condensates (A) Representative confocal images and line-in- tensity profiles of the indicated regions of HEK293T cells co-expressing RIa-GFP2 or RIaA99S-GFP2 plus Ca-mRuby2 (n = 10 cells from 4 independent experiments). Scale bars, 10 mm. (B) Pearson’s coefficient per RIa puncta in HEK293T cells co-expressing RIa-GFP2 (n = 2,288 puncta before and n = 2,502 puncta after stimulation) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (n = 1,055 puncta before and n = 1,253 after stimulation) with Ca-mRuby2. Effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d. Error bars indicate mean ± SD. (C) Schematic illustrating the classical model of dissociation of the canonical PKA holoenzyme (top) and the proposed model of the non-canonical R:C interaction (bottom). In the classical model, binding of cAMP (blue dots) to the CNB domains (open circles) causes complete dissociation of PKA-C (triangles), in contrast to the proposed non-canon- ical interaction in which active PKA-C remains tethered to RIa via the linker region. (D) Recovery kinetics (t1/2) of RIa puncta in HEK293T cells expressing RIa-GFP2 alone (RIa/; n = 35 puncta) or co-expressing Ca-mCherry plus either RIa-GFP2 (RIa/Ca; n = 51 puncta) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (A99S/Ca; n = 42 puncta) measured using FRAP. Error bars indicate median ± 95% CI. ****p = 6.15 3 106 (RIa vs. RIa/Ca), ***p = 0.000845 (RIa/Ca vs. A99S/Ca); ns, not significant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple- comparisons test. (E) Average amplitude-weighted lifetimes measured from RIa puncta in HEK293T cells expressing RIa-GFP2 alone (RIa/; n = 39 cells) or co-express- ing Ca-mCherry plus either RIa-GFP2 (RIa/Ca; n = 54 cells) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (A99S/Ca; n = 50 cells). Error bars indicate mean ± SD. **p = 0.0066 (RIa/ vs. RIa/ Ca), ****p = 2.913 105 (RIa/Ca vs. A99S/Ca); ns, not significant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA fol- lowed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparisons test. (F) Normalized FluoSTEP-AKAR R/G emission ratio when RIa-FP11 (RIa; n = 41 cells), RIaA99S-FP11 (A99S; n = 42 cells), or RIa-FP11 and RIa(62–113)- mTagBFP (RIa/Linker; n = 38 cells) are expressed in RIa-KO HEK293T cells treated with 10 mM H89, followed by washout and addition of Fsk/IBMX. ****p = 1.98 3 105 (RIa vs. A99S), ****p = 6.95 3 105 (RIa vs. RIa/Linker); ns, not significant; un- paired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (G) Normalized <t>AKAR4</t> Y/C emission ratio change in RIa-KO HEK293T cells treated with 10 mM H89, followed by washout and addition of Fsk/IBMX in the absence (KO; n = 69 cells) or presence of RIa-mRuby2 (RIa; n = 53 cells) or RIaA99S-mRuby2 (A99S; n = 87 cells) expression. Error bars indicate median ± 95% CI. ***p = 6.16 3 104 (KO vs. RIa), ****p = 1.23 3 105 (RIa vs. A99S); ns, not signifi- cant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparisons test. See also Figure S6.
N A Pcdna3 Akar4 Depry, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/pm38537638-585-10-22?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
n a pcdna3 akar4 depry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab 8 1 software  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc matlab 8 1 software
Figure 6. Non-canonical recruitment of PKA catalytic subunit to RIa condensates (A) Representative confocal images and line-in- tensity profiles of the indicated regions of HEK293T cells co-expressing RIa-GFP2 or RIaA99S-GFP2 plus Ca-mRuby2 (n = 10 cells from 4 independent experiments). Scale bars, 10 mm. (B) Pearson’s coefficient per RIa puncta in HEK293T cells co-expressing RIa-GFP2 (n = 2,288 puncta before and n = 2,502 puncta after stimulation) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (n = 1,055 puncta before and n = 1,253 after stimulation) with Ca-mRuby2. Effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d. Error bars indicate mean ± SD. (C) Schematic illustrating the classical model of dissociation of the canonical PKA holoenzyme (top) and the proposed model of the non-canonical R:C interaction (bottom). In the classical model, binding of cAMP (blue dots) to the CNB domains (open circles) causes complete dissociation of PKA-C (triangles), in contrast to the proposed non-canon- ical interaction in which active PKA-C remains tethered to RIa via the linker region. (D) Recovery kinetics (t1/2) of RIa puncta in HEK293T cells expressing RIa-GFP2 alone (RIa/; n = 35 puncta) or co-expressing Ca-mCherry plus either RIa-GFP2 (RIa/Ca; n = 51 puncta) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (A99S/Ca; n = 42 puncta) measured using FRAP. Error bars indicate median ± 95% CI. ****p = 6.15 3 106 (RIa vs. RIa/Ca), ***p = 0.000845 (RIa/Ca vs. A99S/Ca); ns, not significant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple- comparisons test. (E) Average amplitude-weighted lifetimes measured from RIa puncta in HEK293T cells expressing RIa-GFP2 alone (RIa/; n = 39 cells) or co-express- ing Ca-mCherry plus either RIa-GFP2 (RIa/Ca; n = 54 cells) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (A99S/Ca; n = 50 cells). Error bars indicate mean ± SD. **p = 0.0066 (RIa/ vs. RIa/ Ca), ****p = 2.913 105 (RIa/Ca vs. A99S/Ca); ns, not significant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA fol- lowed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparisons test. (F) Normalized FluoSTEP-AKAR R/G emission ratio when RIa-FP11 (RIa; n = 41 cells), RIaA99S-FP11 (A99S; n = 42 cells), or RIa-FP11 and RIa(62–113)- mTagBFP (RIa/Linker; n = 38 cells) are expressed in RIa-KO HEK293T cells treated with 10 mM H89, followed by washout and addition of Fsk/IBMX. ****p = 1.98 3 105 (RIa vs. A99S), ****p = 6.95 3 105 (RIa vs. RIa/Linker); ns, not significant; un- paired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (G) Normalized <t>AKAR4</t> Y/C emission ratio change in RIa-KO HEK293T cells treated with 10 mM H89, followed by washout and addition of Fsk/IBMX in the absence (KO; n = 69 cells) or presence of RIa-mRuby2 (RIa; n = 53 cells) or RIaA99S-mRuby2 (A99S; n = 87 cells) expression. Error bars indicate median ± 95% CI. ***p = 6.16 3 104 (KO vs. RIa), ****p = 1.23 3 105 (RIa vs. A99S); ns, not signifi- cant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparisons test. See also Figure S6.
Matlab 8 1 Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matrix+%28matlab%29+version+8%2E1+%28r2013a%29/10__1016_slash_j__fuel__2022__126166-175-4-8?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab 8 1 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 6. Non-canonical recruitment of PKA catalytic subunit to RIa condensates (A) Representative confocal images and line-in- tensity profiles of the indicated regions of HEK293T cells co-expressing RIa-GFP2 or RIaA99S-GFP2 plus Ca-mRuby2 (n = 10 cells from 4 independent experiments). Scale bars, 10 mm. (B) Pearson’s coefficient per RIa puncta in HEK293T cells co-expressing RIa-GFP2 (n = 2,288 puncta before and n = 2,502 puncta after stimulation) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (n = 1,055 puncta before and n = 1,253 after stimulation) with Ca-mRuby2. Effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d. Error bars indicate mean ± SD. (C) Schematic illustrating the classical model of dissociation of the canonical PKA holoenzyme (top) and the proposed model of the non-canonical R:C interaction (bottom). In the classical model, binding of cAMP (blue dots) to the CNB domains (open circles) causes complete dissociation of PKA-C (triangles), in contrast to the proposed non-canon- ical interaction in which active PKA-C remains tethered to RIa via the linker region. (D) Recovery kinetics (t1/2) of RIa puncta in HEK293T cells expressing RIa-GFP2 alone (RIa/; n = 35 puncta) or co-expressing Ca-mCherry plus either RIa-GFP2 (RIa/Ca; n = 51 puncta) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (A99S/Ca; n = 42 puncta) measured using FRAP. Error bars indicate median ± 95% CI. ****p = 6.15 3 106 (RIa vs. RIa/Ca), ***p = 0.000845 (RIa/Ca vs. A99S/Ca); ns, not significant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple- comparisons test. (E) Average amplitude-weighted lifetimes measured from RIa puncta in HEK293T cells expressing RIa-GFP2 alone (RIa/; n = 39 cells) or co-express- ing Ca-mCherry plus either RIa-GFP2 (RIa/Ca; n = 54 cells) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (A99S/Ca; n = 50 cells). Error bars indicate mean ± SD. **p = 0.0066 (RIa/ vs. RIa/ Ca), ****p = 2.913 105 (RIa/Ca vs. A99S/Ca); ns, not significant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA fol- lowed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparisons test. (F) Normalized FluoSTEP-AKAR R/G emission ratio when RIa-FP11 (RIa; n = 41 cells), RIaA99S-FP11 (A99S; n = 42 cells), or RIa-FP11 and RIa(62–113)- mTagBFP (RIa/Linker; n = 38 cells) are expressed in RIa-KO HEK293T cells treated with 10 mM H89, followed by washout and addition of Fsk/IBMX. ****p = 1.98 3 105 (RIa vs. A99S), ****p = 6.95 3 105 (RIa vs. RIa/Linker); ns, not significant; un- paired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (G) Normalized AKAR4 Y/C emission ratio change in RIa-KO HEK293T cells treated with 10 mM H89, followed by washout and addition of Fsk/IBMX in the absence (KO; n = 69 cells) or presence of RIa-mRuby2 (RIa; n = 53 cells) or RIaA99S-mRuby2 (A99S; n = 87 cells) expression. Error bars indicate median ± 95% CI. ***p = 6.16 3 104 (KO vs. RIa), ****p = 1.23 3 105 (RIa vs. A99S); ns, not signifi- cant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparisons test. See also Figure S6.

Journal: Molecular cell

Article Title: Molecular determinants and signaling effects of PKA RIα phase separation.

doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.03.002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. Non-canonical recruitment of PKA catalytic subunit to RIa condensates (A) Representative confocal images and line-in- tensity profiles of the indicated regions of HEK293T cells co-expressing RIa-GFP2 or RIaA99S-GFP2 plus Ca-mRuby2 (n = 10 cells from 4 independent experiments). Scale bars, 10 mm. (B) Pearson’s coefficient per RIa puncta in HEK293T cells co-expressing RIa-GFP2 (n = 2,288 puncta before and n = 2,502 puncta after stimulation) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (n = 1,055 puncta before and n = 1,253 after stimulation) with Ca-mRuby2. Effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d. Error bars indicate mean ± SD. (C) Schematic illustrating the classical model of dissociation of the canonical PKA holoenzyme (top) and the proposed model of the non-canonical R:C interaction (bottom). In the classical model, binding of cAMP (blue dots) to the CNB domains (open circles) causes complete dissociation of PKA-C (triangles), in contrast to the proposed non-canon- ical interaction in which active PKA-C remains tethered to RIa via the linker region. (D) Recovery kinetics (t1/2) of RIa puncta in HEK293T cells expressing RIa-GFP2 alone (RIa/; n = 35 puncta) or co-expressing Ca-mCherry plus either RIa-GFP2 (RIa/Ca; n = 51 puncta) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (A99S/Ca; n = 42 puncta) measured using FRAP. Error bars indicate median ± 95% CI. ****p = 6.15 3 106 (RIa vs. RIa/Ca), ***p = 0.000845 (RIa/Ca vs. A99S/Ca); ns, not significant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple- comparisons test. (E) Average amplitude-weighted lifetimes measured from RIa puncta in HEK293T cells expressing RIa-GFP2 alone (RIa/; n = 39 cells) or co-express- ing Ca-mCherry plus either RIa-GFP2 (RIa/Ca; n = 54 cells) or RIaA99S-GFP2 (A99S/Ca; n = 50 cells). Error bars indicate mean ± SD. **p = 0.0066 (RIa/ vs. RIa/ Ca), ****p = 2.913 105 (RIa/Ca vs. A99S/Ca); ns, not significant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA fol- lowed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparisons test. (F) Normalized FluoSTEP-AKAR R/G emission ratio when RIa-FP11 (RIa; n = 41 cells), RIaA99S-FP11 (A99S; n = 42 cells), or RIa-FP11 and RIa(62–113)- mTagBFP (RIa/Linker; n = 38 cells) are expressed in RIa-KO HEK293T cells treated with 10 mM H89, followed by washout and addition of Fsk/IBMX. ****p = 1.98 3 105 (RIa vs. A99S), ****p = 6.95 3 105 (RIa vs. RIa/Linker); ns, not significant; un- paired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (G) Normalized AKAR4 Y/C emission ratio change in RIa-KO HEK293T cells treated with 10 mM H89, followed by washout and addition of Fsk/IBMX in the absence (KO; n = 69 cells) or presence of RIa-mRuby2 (RIa; n = 53 cells) or RIaA99S-mRuby2 (A99S; n = 87 cells) expression. Error bars indicate median ± 95% CI. ***p = 6.16 3 104 (KO vs. RIa), ****p = 1.23 3 105 (RIa vs. A99S); ns, not signifi- cant; Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparisons test. See also Figure S6.

Article Snippet: REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER pcDNA3 FluoSTEP-AKAR Zhang et al.21 N/A pcDNA3 AKAR4 Depry et al.55 N/A pcDNA3 Epac-SH188 Klarenbeek et al.79 Addgene plasmid #170349 Software and algorithms MATLAB (R2019a) MathWorks https://www.mathworks.com/ products/matlab.html PRISM (10.1.0) GraphPad https://www.graphpad.com/ scientific-software/prism/ Adobe Illustrator (26.5) Adobe https://www.adobe.com/ products/illustrator.html Fiji (ImageJ) NIH https://imagej.net/software/ fiji/downloads METAFLUOR (7.7) Molecular Devices https://www.moleculardevices.com/ products/cellular-imaging-systems/ acquisition-and-analysis-software/ metamorph-microscopy NIS-Elements AR (5.21.02) Nikon https://www.microscope.healthcare. nikon.com/products/software/ nis-elements/nis-elementsadvanced-research PyMOL Schrödinger, Inc. https://pymol.org/dokuwiki/ doku.php?id=installation Chimera UCSF https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera Coot Emsley et al.80 https://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/ personal/pemsley/coot/ MolProbity Williams et al.81 http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/

Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Two Tailed Test